Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Vivien <samuel.vivien@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Modular explicits in pre-OCaml 5.5
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:23:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d5f115c-866d-4cc0-a102-73657778a0e2@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861de205-0471-4a17-b020-c0494914437b@inria.fr>

Indeed. Modular explicit does not add any expressiveness to the language 
(and does not impact the soundness of the type system). Every program 
that can be written using modular explicits could have been written with 
a functor encoded as a first-class module.

We presented this encoding in section 1.5 of this paper about modular 
explicits : https://hal.science/hal-05428136/document

On 6/25/26 14:45, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. Does this mean that modular explicits, 
> strictly speaking, bring no additional expressivity but only a simpler 
> way to do these things? Or are there programs that could be expressed 
> with modular explicits but not with constrained module types?

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-24  4:16 oleg
2026-06-25 12:45 ` Olivier Nicole
2026-06-25 14:23   ` Samuel Vivien [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d5f115c-866d-4cc0-a102-73657778a0e2@inria.fr \
    --to=samuel.vivien@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox