From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA07843 for caml-red; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:25:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA11577 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:02:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from suburbia.net (suburbia.net [203.4.184.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e61A1v107779; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:01:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by suburbia.net (Postfix, from userid 110) id 90CC46C4C2; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:01:54 +1000 (EST) To: Daniel de Rauglaudre Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: How to cleanly encode "quasi-constants"? References: <20000630100423.A9018@jaune.inria.fr> Cc: proff@iq.org From: Julian Assange Date: 01 Jul 2000 20:01:54 +1000 In-Reply-To: Daniel de Rauglaudre's message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:04:23 +0200" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) XEmacs/21.1 (Big Bend) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Daniel de Rauglaudre writes: > Hello, > > > Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:12:50 -0700 (PDT), Brian Rogoff pisze: > > > > > I admit I'm also fond of the Revised syntax. > > > > Sorry, I'm new: what is the Revised syntax? Where can I read about it? > > It is a alternative syntax for Ocaml proposed in Camlp4, supposed to > fix some syntax problems in the language. > > http://caml.inria.fr/camlp4/manual/ The revised syntax is cleaner, but drops so much syntactic sugar, that the language becomes ugly due to its verbosity. Cheers, Julian.