From: Julian Assange <proff@iq.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: proff@iq.org
Subject: explict vs inexplicit constant parameters
Date: 03 Aug 2000 14:10:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wxn1ivrnld.fsf@foo.iq.org> (raw)
I often use the following:
let findpair e l =
let rec find = function
| [] -> None
| (a,b)::tl -> if a = e then Some b else findpair tl
in
find l
instead of:
let findpair e l =
let rec find e = function
| [] -> None
| (a,b)::tl -> if a = e then Some b else findpair e tl
in
find e l
Is ocaml able to generate faster code for the former?
Stylistically, I'm not sure whether these constructs are a good thing
or not. Symbolic brevity makes makes it easier to read for small
contexts. On the other hand for larger contexts, the de-localisation
of variables makes the whole thing harder to follow and dangerous to
re-order.
Cheers,
Julian.
next reply other threads:[~2000-08-04 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-03 4:10 Julian Assange [this message]
2000-08-04 18:23 ` Alain Frisch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wxn1ivrnld.fsf@foo.iq.org \
--to=proff@iq.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox