From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA26933 for caml-redistribution; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 09:06:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA19896 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:29:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ux5.cso.uiuc.edu (ux5.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.45]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19916 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:29:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [128.174.241.25] (mtdoom.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.241.25]) by ux5.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA15683 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:29:03 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: jjones@students.cso.uiuc.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <19980902192356.36292@pauillac.inria.fr> References: ; from Todd Graham Lewis on Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 01:18:34AM -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:29:02 -0500 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Joel Jones Subject: Re: VLIW & caml: how? Sender: weis One thing to look at is the work done by the CAR group at HP Labs. They have a collabaration with two university research groups, one at UIUC and another at NYU. For more information, see: http:www.trimaran.org/ The upcoming Merced is a big break from current ILP microarchitectures, and even from older VLIW designs. Xavier Leroy is correct in asserting that compilers have to be almost completely rethought to take advantage of ILP designs with lots of parallelism. Joel Jones jjones@uiuc.edu