Re: [Caml-list] ReasonML concrete syntax

[=?gb18030?B?Qm9i?= <bob.hongbo.zhang@foxmail.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030", Size: 1188 bytes --]

Let¡¯s be civil. Note that I did not write a single line of reason, but I understand it¡¯s intention to use a more familiar function application syntax and it seems to be appreciated by quite a few people.
 There are issues though, the parens are overloaded in too many context, if it uses ¡®[¡® for tuple like what typescript did, then such ambiguity would be removed 


·¢×ÔÎÒµÄiPhone

------------------ Original ------------------
From: Evgeny Khramtsov <xramtsov@gmail.com>
Date: ÖÜÒ»,12ÔÂ 11,2017 3:12 ÏÂÎç
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ReasonML concrete syntax



Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:50:02 +0100
Sven SAULEAU <sven.sauleau@xtuc.fr> wrote:

> The reason behind that move (from Reasonml version 2 to 3), is that
> it feels more natural to JavaScript developers.

If you develop software for idiots, only idiots will use it (c)

Come on, if you cannot learn a new syntax, you're an idiot. No
exceptions.

-- 
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1704 bytes --]