From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8184ABC37 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:37 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au1NACigXktQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACRbIofAQEWJL02hDkEhUs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,347,1262559600"; d="scan'208";a="54725967" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 26 Jan 2010 17:01:36 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NZnr9-0007nJ-Q5 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:31 +0100 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:31 +0100 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: ExtLib/Camomile UTF8 Followup-To: gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux) Sender: news Cc: ocaml-lib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 camomile:01 yoriyuki:01 yamagata:01 yoriyuki:01 camomile:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 beginners:01 wrote:01 cristal:01 probability:01 On 26-01-2010, Yoriyuki Yamagata wrote: > >> Also maybe you could host Camomile at >> forge.ocamlcore.org... > > What is the benefit of it? There are many benefits: - better visibility among other OCaml projects - beginners can easily find your library - people that don't know OCaml can easily see that they are many libraries for OCaml, just having a look at forge.ocamlcore.org - integration of news from your project directly into the feed of the forge which goes to planet.ocamlcore.org - people that could fill a bug report have a high probability to be subscribed to forge.ocamlcore.org for their own projects On the other hand, I don't like to criticize but Sourceforge is not cristal clear with UI (I agree that GForge/forge.ocamlcore.org is also not very good at this). Moreover, we do have a lot of problems with tracking new release of Sourceforge projects in Debian: we cannot easily access download section. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall