From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF7DBC6C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:50:02 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAANyoEfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQJgEBAQgKKZ98 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,280,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7445917" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 21:50:02 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0UKo1eU014797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:50:02 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAE9xoEdQW+UCh2dsb2JhbACQJgEBAQgKKZ91 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,280,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="21993237" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 21:50:01 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJsb-00080v-8x for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:49:57 +0000 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:49:57 +0000 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:49:57 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: [OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1201440183.6302.27.camel@Blefuscu> <527cf6bc0801301225r210faed0y860d56c6e49572c9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Debian) Sender: news X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47A0E2F9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 ocaml:01 wiki:01 wiki:01 vaguely:01 storm:98 wrote:01 defined:02 classified:97 suggestion:03 seems:03 tend:03 blue:96 debian:04 debian:04 On 30-01-2008, blue storm wrote: >> Yes, but we should add some more rules: >> * designate 1 person that will sync discussion and OSR on the wiki >> (maybe the one who start the thread) >> * limit the time of disscussion (1 month) >> * limit the time of vote (1 week) >> >> If the time limit is reached, the current text (as sync by the person in >> charge on the wiki) is put on vote: >> >> Subject: [OSR] XML processing -- >> Read the OSR: http://wiki.cocan.org/osr/XMLProcessing. >> >> Choice: >> [ ] Accept the OSR >> [ ] Further discussion >> >> Please classify this choices (you should put 1 to the best choice). >> >> >> We should find a way to allow only one vote per person. >> >> After one week of voting, choices are classified (Methode Condorcet) and >> the best choice win. >> >> If the choice is "Further discussion", the discussion should last >> another month. >> >> This way, you prevent endless discussion (non converging one) by a final >> decision after one month. >> >> Regards, >> Sylvain Le Gall > > I'm sorry, but this seems far too complicated to me. > You jokingly admitted that Debian people tend to have "bureaucratic" > methods. Now i can see what you mean :) > > I'm not fond of the "let's vote" idea. I think most discussions can be > sorted out by reaching a consensus, wich is a vaguely defined idea, > but works very well in practice. > The draft (ideas) i send is almost a copy of the Debian way of doing... I am caught ;-) This is just a suggestion. I am only afraid that some point of view never converge, and i don't like the idea of things being blocked by a minority (in particular some people tends to post more than necessary -- just as me today, but they are not representative to the real problem...) Regards, Sylvain Le Gall