Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: log function without evaluate arguments
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 16:57:54 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnfj178i.lee.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47309EEC.4080706@menta.net>

On 06-11-2007, tmp123 <tmp123@menta.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to implement a function that prints log messages only, by
> example, if a boolean flag is true, and does nothing elsewhere, I've
> been reading the (long) post sequence "kprintf with user formatters"
> (2004 Jun 30).
>
> In this context, "does nothing" means not convert parameters to text nor
> evaluate them.
>
> If my understanting of the reading has been correct, one of the best
> options seems to be something like (in camlp4r revised syntax, I'm more
> used to it):
>
> value log_flag = ref False;
>
> value log e =
>   if log_flag.val
>   then
>     Lazy.force e
>   else ();
>
> and the callers must include lines like:
>
> log (lazy (Printf.printf "%d" (sum 1 3)));
>
> Please, is this a good way? Some sugestions to made it better in
> performance or syntax?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>

I am used to :
 value log e =
   if log_flag.val then
     e ()
   else 
     ();

avec log (fun () -> (Printf.printf "%d" (sum 1 3)))

But the enhancement is minor.

Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-06 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-06 17:05 tmp123
2007-11-06 16:57 ` Sylvain Le Gall [this message]
2007-11-06 18:25 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Pouillard
2007-11-06 18:40   ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-06 18:49     ` Brian Hurt
2007-11-07  3:39       ` Christopher L Conway
2007-11-07  4:00         ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-11-07  4:10           ` Christopher L Conway
2007-11-07 13:42             ` Brian Hurt
2007-11-07 10:21     ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-11-07  3:40 ` Christopher L Conway
     [not found] ` <4a051d930711061938u25836a85ud28c610312e5896f@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-07 10:31   ` tmp123

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=slrnfj178i.lee.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org \
    --to=sylvain@le-gall.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox