From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA31737; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:31:44 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA32616 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:31:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from megs23.100mwh.com ([205.214.86.13]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hB57Vf123505 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:31:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from [205.214.86.158] (helo=uaapc442) by megs23.100mwh.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ASAR6-0007yA-FL; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:31:37 -0700 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:31:45 +0200 To: Jason Hickey Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Troubles with marshaled/unmarshaled exception Cc: caml-list@inria.fr References: <3FCFCDF0.3070606@cs.caltech.edu> From: Artem Prisyznuk Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=koi8-r MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3FCFCDF0.3070606@cs.caltech.edu> User-Agent: Opera7.22/Win32 M2 build 3221 X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - megs23.100mwh.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - inria.fr X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sit.kiev.ua X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 marshaled:01 unmarshaled:01 artem:01 hickey:01 marshaling:01 marshaling:01 artem:01 implementors:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 closure:01 caltech:01 marshal:01 exception:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Thanks. I think what put this info to Ocaml Manual is not bad idea. Because I try find any info in Manual about this topic has zero result. On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:14:40 -0800, Jason Hickey wrote: > The short answer is: don't marshal exceptions. > > The longer answer is that exception marshaling is nearly as hard as > function/closure marshaling. I'm sure the OCaml implementors can give a > more precise description, but here is my understanding. > -- Artem Prysyznuk tema@sit.kiev.ua ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners