From: Pixel <pixel@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] -thread and ocamlc vs ocamlc.opt
Date: 16 Jan 2002 17:53:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyvge2i6fl.fsf@leia.mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020116170335.B13963@pauillac.inria.fr>
Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr> writes:
[...]
> > I've been trying to reduce the size of the ocaml rpm which is getting quite
> > huge (27MB), and doing
> > for i in /usr/bin/*.opt ; do
> > ln -s `basename $i` `echo $i | sed "s/.opt$//"`
> > done
> > helps!
>
> Frankly, I would rather remove the .opt compilers from the RPM, rather
> than remove the non-.opt compilers.
?? switching from non-.opt to .opt makes some impressive speed-ups (x2) when
compiling.
>
> Concerning the RPM size, several things should be noted (with tongue
> in cheek):
>
> - If you had one package with gcc, gdb, libc and assorted goodies, it
> would be even larger
the main difference is that not many people would remark if ocaml was not
included ;p
> - Mandrake contains even larger packages of even more dubious utility
> than OCaml
trolls, trolls, vive les trolls :)
> - It is certainly possible to split it into different packages, if you
> think not all users will need everything
done
> - Mandrake could always switch to DVDs as their distribution format :-)
expensive, hard to test, many packages to maintain is costly...
>
> > - should threads.cmxa be included somehow/somewhere? The doc says
> > ocamlopt -thread other options threads.cmxa other files
> > is that wrong?
>
> It also says you have to configure with POSIX threads for this to work.
> The reason this is not the default configuration is that you need to
> trust your POSIX thread implementation and have a good understanding
> of its limitations (slower thread creation, fewer max threads allowed).
> My experience as the initial developer of LinuxThreads suggest that
> these conditions are not often met...
i don't know much about this. Are these conditions met under linux?
thanks!
--
Pixel
programming languages addict http://merd.net/pixel/language-study/
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-16 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-13 21:39 Pixel
2002-01-16 16:03 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-01-16 16:29 ` Sven
2002-01-16 16:38 ` Patrick M Doane
2002-01-16 16:43 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-01-16 16:46 ` Sven
2002-01-16 16:53 ` Pixel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lyvge2i6fl.fsf@leia.mandrakesoft.com \
--to=pixel@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox