From: "Markus Mottl" <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: "Xavier Leroy" <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: "Martin Jambon" <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>,
"Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS" <diego.fernandez_pons@etu.upmc.fr>,
caml-list@inria.fr, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: new+old Camlp4
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8560b80704270643o2b0f23w4a58e85430cd4922@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4631BF33.6080407@inria.fr>
On 4/27/07, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> I agree with the need for documentation, but not with the timing you
> propose. Release 3.10.0 has been delayed quite a bit already, and
> 1- there is no reason to make users who do not depend on Camlp4 wait longer
> for 3.10;
I agree that there are probably many more users who do not depend on
Camlp4 than ones that do.
> 2- having the new Camlp4 officially released as part of 3.10.0 can only
> facilitate the porting of Camlp4 macros and extensions.
Well, I wouldn't exactly say that it facilitates it, but it certainly
enforces it ;-)
> Releasing both old and new Camlp4 as part of 3.10 is out of the
> question, however. That would only delay the inevitable and would
> waste a lot of our time to make such a release.
We certainly understand that INRIA has limited resources and cannot
afford the same level of support that a commercial company would
provide.
> The priorities are
> 1- get 3.10.0 out of the door
Finally we'll get stack backtraces for native code, which is an
extremely important feature for production systems. I guess every
OCaml-developer will be happy about that.
> and 2- of course, provide more documentation on the new Camlp4.
Please!
Best regards,
Markus
--
Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-27 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 22:03 Bug in ocamlyacc David Allsopp
2007-04-24 5:29 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2007-04-24 10:23 ` Diego Olivier FERNANDEZ PONS
2007-04-24 12:06 ` ls-ocaml-developer-2006
2007-04-24 18:25 ` skaller
2007-04-24 20:17 ` new+old Camlp4 (was Re: [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlyacc) Martin Jambon
2007-04-24 21:38 ` Yaron Minsky
2007-04-24 22:53 ` new+old Camlp4 ls-ocaml-developer-2006
2007-04-25 1:03 ` new+old Camlp4 (was Re: [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlyacc) skaller
2007-04-25 2:29 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2007-04-25 17:11 ` Markus Mottl
2007-04-26 3:00 ` skaller
2007-04-27 9:15 ` new+old Camlp4 Xavier Leroy
2007-04-27 13:43 ` Markus Mottl [this message]
2007-05-02 8:03 ` [Caml-list] " Hendrik Tews
2007-04-24 14:32 ` [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlyacc Francois Pottier
2007-04-24 18:59 ` skaller
2007-04-24 19:59 ` Francois Pottier
2007-04-27 15:56 ` brogoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8560b80704270643o2b0f23w4a58e85430cd4922@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markus.mottl@gmail.com \
--cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=diego.fernandez_pons@etu.upmc.fr \
--cc=martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox