From: "Markus Mottl" <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: "Andries Hekstra" <andries.hekstra@philips.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: Another great advantage for OCaml language due to Markus Mottl
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:45:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8560b80603210645i1d93f10fs581525b7a2f123c9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC8FC2507.EB798C1B-ONC1257138.0049CDB0-C1257138.004B957A@philips.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1616 bytes --]
Thanks for the public praise, I do need those, especially in the morning.
But you can send me private mails of appreciation, too. Just not too often,
I might get used to it ;-)
Anyway, to be fair, it should be noted that Chris Hecker came up with the
idea for this patch and implemented a first proof of concept...
Regards,
Markus
On 3/21/06, Andries Hekstra <andries.hekstra@philips.com> wrote:
> Dear Member of the OCaml mailing list,
>
> The problem about which I reported on this reflector around two weeks ago
> (array index violation after around 4 days) has in the mean time been solved
> thanks to the great native function call backtrace for the ocamlopt compiler
> due to Markus Mottl. Given that my program crashed after 3.7 days, and my
> program ran around 30x slower in byte code, debugging using byte code was
> not an option (this slowdown had been similar if I had used _DEBUG mode of a
> C++ program instead of _RELEASE version). Also, as reported earlier, putting
> "try ... with " around all attempts to index an array is not feasbile in
> standard OCaml for array elements in the left hand sides of assignments. A
> static unhandled exception checker provided on a web page, ran into dead
> HTML links.
>
> Hence, the native function call, which comes at minimal runtime overhead
> cost, mainly the cost of -inline 0, is a great new feature that would give
> OCaml another advantage over C++ when added to the OCaml language in a next
> release. Below I give a toy example :
>
>
--
Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2251 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 13:44 Andries Hekstra
2006-03-21 14:45 ` Markus Mottl [this message]
2006-03-21 16:23 ` [Caml-list] " Mike Lin
2006-03-24 22:30 ` Nathaniel Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8560b80603210645i1d93f10fs581525b7a2f123c9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markus.mottl@gmail.com \
--cc=andries.hekstra@philips.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox