From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E281B7F72A for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 20:52:04 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:yaFXGRdJmTGi4vYyD7eW3VknlGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc6/Yx7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGH6ua5ASdZu8rJ8ChbNscdD1ld0YRetjdjKfbNMVf8Iv/uYn5yN+V5f3ghwUuGN1NIEt31fVzYry76xzcTHhLiKVg9fbytScbshsi6n9q/54fUK10RwmHsOPUrdF7v91mZ9pFPx9AzcuBpklqBi0ALUtwe/XlvK1OXkkS0zeaL17knzR5tvek8/dVLS6TwcvdwZ7VZCDM7LzJ9v5Wz5lGQBTeIs3AVV2FTlhtTHyDE6gv7V9H/qHjUrO14jQWTO8z3SfgeUCi/9aZtAEvkgSEGNjoR+mjLl9ZxiuRcuh339E83+JLdfIzAbKk2RajaZ95PHWc= Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=daniil@baturin.org; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=daniil@baturin.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@srv-se.enfan.org Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniil@baturin.org) identity=pra; client-ip=46.253.202.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniil@baturin.org"; x-sender="daniil@baturin.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of daniil@baturin.org designates 46.253.202.162 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=46.253.202.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniil@baturin.org"; x-sender="daniil@baturin.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@srv-se.enfan.org) identity=helo; client-ip=46.253.202.162; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniil@baturin.org"; x-sender="postmaster@srv-se.enfan.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AzBwB+Ga5Xb6LK/S5ehERSuy2GHQIIgT88EAEBAQEBAQEBEQFxQRCBYRaCFwEFQAEBOA8LGBwSVxMIAQGIMa5IhSsBAQWLcxcGCIgiglWFDBeEeI8Sii+DPIFzik1ujW6MNYN4NYQjZIVWgVUBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AzBwB+Ga5Xb6LK/S5ehERSuy2GHQIIgT88EAEBAQEBAQEBEQFxQRCBYRaCFwEFQAEBOA8LGBwSVxMIAQGIMa5IhSsBAQWLcxcGCIgiglWFDBeEeI8Sii+DPIFzik1ujW6MNYN4NYQjZIVWgVUBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,512,1464645600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="187535273" Received: from srv-se.enfan.org ([46.253.202.162]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Aug 2016 20:52:04 +0200 Received: from eirin.enfan.tld (unknown [46.236.133.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by srv-se.enfan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9A791291C8 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:52:02 +0600 (NOVT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baturin.org; s=default; t=1471027923; bh=RmmEUuU7D7EhHkqmob22uqM9FxjfIyaG0nMq6esfdzc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JY76dHgvaziAhru88lsykc/Hqkq9JcwmIbVV0ufPs7YAsf+FZ/wYOVMyzEyczomJ2 yet2b+M92Y/gQxwMZIl0j0pgW4jGqPILyLyJAi3R9ydmPL7gBS/syoefhZ55ZZJHq+ Mmvzcvj+zXLB9ejEfnOzrRThrtwSk94tcrFZqH/Y= To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <806711471021664@web20h.yandex.ru> From: Daniil Baturin Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:51:53 +0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <806711471021664@web20h.yandex.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qGuMFUn88Qrw6SWTul9E0nSNpDLKPF4PP" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] are caml light and ocaml bytecodes different? This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qGuMFUn88Qrw6SWTul9E0nSNpDLKPF4PP Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gWwe2P3GK1vjsIXjpfpEgG2luOPbF8E1l" From: Daniil Baturin To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] are caml light and ocaml bytecodes different? References: <806711471021664@web20h.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <806711471021664@web20h.yandex.ru> --gWwe2P3GK1vjsIXjpfpEgG2luOPbF8E1l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They are different. Even between different OCaml versions the bytecode format is not guaranteed to remain fully compatible. On 08/12/2016 11:07 PM, Bergman Andrey wrote: > Bonjour! > > Are formats of camllight and ocaml bytecodes different? > Have you added some new instructions? Or you have preserved compatibility? > > Thank you, > Andrey. > --=20 #!/usr/bin/env perl @a=3Dsplit(//, "daniil @ baturin . org" );# Daniil Baturin @b=3Dsplit(//,q/Px%!+o0Q6lh*7dp$.@8#%|y{/);while($i<24){$_.=3D chr((ord(@b[$i])-ord(@a[$i])+62)%94+32);$i++};print"$_\n"# --gWwe2P3GK1vjsIXjpfpEgG2luOPbF8E1l-- --qGuMFUn88Qrw6SWTul9E0nSNpDLKPF4PP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXrhrJAAoJEEcm35UR4K8f7BUP/RXOsKGKQiY+3N6CaX+hxDgj krt0kiM03/NxHALwStPVkRyNmi/3IUoDda4F9CVg7J/ximcqnqovAAIIYODY5H6y dl1IUHHsy15cMBYNp2hLNMKa4Ibeq1iwzpAJDdGbYc+YvszkywnrLl/1ReZn+vHB vQ7feYUdT/IVsCaq0rp9Immxnia/ILGTmMdJcewI9SL9SIcMsMKqwxqTZbnQPK6/ c5qJHlcKS6+N/6jLyEqVGhLnNsWyvIaMCb0NbDFDrF0LEAJ6DmvxNQ3pwvtOdNVt Rn+vuHQ8v+/JRFyQeSay6DB3J1OMiCpiIMqGFhecJMYNtm4H6MMvZeYTLgfL2xeh xe9gNf057sSd7WnZLIwh7fQwY//QtJEfOK+qFtOtEfNrbp2exa1H7gHBY3T6xleY vX/i48+r+JeQmIU2iZswwWx2CnM7uOGmPd/afYmKkgNd+FPMjebASkUWmzehQbe4 QAj/+d/Up1hoseqKeNylQk6U66V76m1fmnlnkFgtPV4D9+MypWOK7K4qtt42r7h1 +Nj5BGk4cpvTUGXaAhY7bMZ/vpioHWKzn7lFWNO9pY9pZ7DDGGHAvngqxkO6AS9+ 59sco+RMpRLgzOkUos6avAScE/u2q6KzU5mc/ivnJptzw+lXhevyRS8YVpFpm+Pt xbj3up4yMPD1r5dqblAj =GbSo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qGuMFUn88Qrw6SWTul9E0nSNpDLKPF4PP--