* [Caml-list] choosing which cairo bindings [not found] <1386161829.1287374.1507128381422.ref@mail.yahoo.com> @ 2017-10-04 14:46 ` Philippe STRAUSS 2017-10-07 12:43 ` R 3 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Philippe STRAUSS @ 2017-10-04 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: caml-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 130 bytes --] Hello OCaml peoples, What are the rationale arguments for choosing between cairo 1.2.0 and cairo2 0.5 (opam versioning)? Regards. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 643 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] choosing which cairo bindings 2017-10-04 14:46 ` [Caml-list] choosing which cairo bindings Philippe STRAUSS @ 2017-10-07 12:43 ` R 3 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: R 3 @ 2017-10-07 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: caml-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --] Hello, they are two projects made independently. cairo 1.2.0 is closer to the original API (just a collection of bindings), while cairo2 tries to capture more errors and make a more complete ocaml interface. You should have a look at both API/documentation to see what you feel the best. I used cairo 1.2.0 and it worked well. William On 10/04/2017 04:46 PM, Philippe STRAUSS wrote: > Hello OCaml peoples, > > What are the rationale arguments for choosing between cairo 1.2.0 and > cairo2 0.5 (opam versioning)? > > > Regards. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1566 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-07 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1386161829.1287374.1507128381422.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2017-10-04 14:46 ` [Caml-list] choosing which cairo bindings Philippe STRAUSS
2017-10-07 12:43 ` R 3
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox