Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
To: Roland Zumkeller <roland.zumkeller@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ignoring toplevel phrases?
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:44:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8be5ae20906261044n578aeabeg1f09b22d8d87268a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d02dcb040906252122w522022bbu69cdb5f5ade6ccf4@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1286 bytes --]

Just curious, why do you want this?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Roland Zumkeller <
roland.zumkeller@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to modify the toplevel's behavior such that it silently
> ignores any re-definitions of already bound identifiers (without
> recompiling)? I would like to achieve the following:
>
> # let x = 0;;
> val x : int = 0
> # let x = 1;;
> # x;;
> - : int = 0
>
> The following code is supposed to replace all toplevel phrases by
> "();;" during parsing (just as an experiment, it renders the toplevel
> useless of course).
>
> let original = !Toploop.parse_toplevel_phrase;;
>
> Toploop.parse_toplevel_phrase :=
>  fun _ -> original (Lexing.from_string ("();;"));;
>
> After executing this, a non-terminating sequence is shown:
> - : unit = ()
> - : unit = ()
> - : unit = ()
> ...
>
> I'm probably not using the right hook. Any insight would be appreciated.
>
> Best,
>
> Roland
>
> --
> http://roland.zumkeller.googlepages.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2057 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-26 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-26  4:22 Roland Zumkeller
2009-06-26 17:44 ` Ashish Agarwal [this message]
2009-07-01  3:16   ` [Caml-list] " Roland Zumkeller
2009-06-27  8:32 ` Richard Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8be5ae20906261044n578aeabeg1f09b22d8d87268a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=agarwal1975@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=roland.zumkeller@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox