From: henri dubois-ferriere <henridf@gmail.com>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Cc: briand@aracnet.com, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] why aren't methods visible inside class definition
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 10:45:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d61254fb04122601452780fa1e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041226.075525.106353835.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
> Methods are seen as similar to records fields, so you must be explicit
> about the object when calling them.
> Also, methods may have no arguments, while functions must have at
> least one.
> Last, this distinction lets you use the same name for a field and a
> method. This is sometimes comfortable.
for a *value* (not field) and method i suppose
henri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-26 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 18:23 briand
2004-12-25 22:55 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-26 9:45 ` henri dubois-ferriere [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d61254fb04122601452780fa1e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=henridf@gmail.com \
--cc=briand@aracnet.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox