From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96DEBB81 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:25:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBIBPXdW012769 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:25:33 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA03713 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:25:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBIBPVxT023862 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:25:32 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so111028wra for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:25:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ojKBMaoHboL5XaqUI8vvubraSscKP50eQrWrZNmzHYj7pH/QK5iCVeJtsf+9tUipVbhaQCK84I1/ih8n4m3Hb4qygFrycPD95ROdh/ZNvCVK1m7fBMAqt5GDZV/gNm/aug5pGbkS90jShYP8Gd//NJZledvRbhZf/MIHybuhAls= Received: by 10.54.15.35 with SMTP id 35mr143170wro; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.38.38 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:25:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:25:31 +0100 From: henri dubois-ferriere Reply-To: henri dubois-ferriere To: Alex Baretta Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OT] Rant about VCS Cc: Ocaml In-Reply-To: <41C3126A.3060101@barettadeit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41C3126A.3060101@barettadeit.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41C413AD.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41C413AB.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; henridf:01 caml-list:01 cvs:01 henri:05 henri:05 elaborate:06 switching:07 seem:07 i'm:08 unstable:08 i've:11 point:11 things:11 but:12 such:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: > Other VCSs such as subversion seem to be so unstable as to severely > discourage their use in an industrial project. never used it myself, but i've heard lots of positive things from people using subversion lately, in particular that it is reliable and stable. [to the point i'm finally considering switching over from cvs] can you elaborate on the instability of subversion? tx henri