From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May OCAML Helps?
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cuq1b2$osi$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
"
A cooperation between Sun Microsystems and IBM&Co. in conjunction with
liberal & high evolutive communities would result in an nearly
unbeatable programming platform.
My evaluation has shown: this is a non achievable goal, as stubborness
and egoism rules - instead of reason and cooperation.
Thus I leave all those ridiculous folks behind, which will continue to
do an excellent job in keeping the very promising JAVA platform far
below the technological level it could be
"
-
"
Of course It's a sad day.
Censorship (NetBeans, Eclipse) has forced me to move.
No platform is _really_ open, thus I cannot build on them:
http://lazaridis.com/core/project/open.html
"
-
"I'm sure there is one community out there which will realize immediatly
the benefits of an high-evolutive system. "
-
source: [messages within thread]
[JAVA] [EVALUATION] - The Java Failure (Sorry: The Java(tm) Failure)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.softwaretools/msg/...
-
-
-
During the 6 months evaluation i've extracted several constructs.
"How it should be to become high evolutive"
-
I don't know OCAML.
Basicly I would like to do everything in C++.
But development must go quicker.
-
Possibly it's time to structure OCAML projects in a way similar to
Sun's Java, NetBeans and especially IBM&Co's Eclipse (but of course more
efficient and evolutive):
http://lazaridis.com/case/ide/project/index.html
www.osgi.org and similar standards should (whenever possible) be used.
Companies in the Embedded World should be intrested in an OCAML osgi
implementation.
[Note: i've not verified technical and legal applicability]
-
osgi is just a detail.
The goal would be: to make a high competitive andhigh evolutive
programming platform / Rich Client Platform based on OCAML.
-
My question is essentially:
How many of those constructs are already supported by OCAML (and the
surrounding open-source-projects):
http://lazaridis.com/case/stack/index.html
-
Please notify the people within the relevant OCAML communities about
this thread.
.
--
http://lazaridis.com
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-14 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 11:19 Ilias Lazaridis [this message]
2005-02-14 21:54 ` Ilias Lazaridis
2005-02-14 22:24 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2005-02-14 23:19 ` Paul Snively
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='cuq1b2$osi$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=ilias@lazaridis.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox