From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA15560; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:22:36 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA15547 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:22:34 +0100 (MET) From: nickgrey@softhome.net Received: from jive.SoftHome.net (jive.SoftHome.net [66.54.152.27]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i230MWUM003653 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:22:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 24274 invoked by uid 417); 3 Mar 2004 00:22:29 -0000 Received: from mambo-.softhome.net (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.2.15) by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 00:22:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 417) by softhome.net with local; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:22:29 -0700 References: <16452.49607.575894.790498@barrow.artisan.com> In-Reply-To: <16452.49607.575894.790498@barrow.artisan.com> To: "John Gerard Malecki" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Different behaviour in native and bytecode compilations (Compiler Bug?) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:22:29 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: nickgrey@softhome.net X-Originating-IP: [81.178.226.3] Message-ID: X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; compilations:01 bug:01 ocamlc:01 -version:01 3.07:01 ocamlopt:01 -version:01 3.07:01 3.06.:01 3.06:01 bug:01 3.06:01 compiler:01 bytecode:01 behaviour:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 27 John Gerard Malecki writes: > I built your program "out of the box" and I get the exact behavior for > all executables. > > X > X > X > > X > X > X > > :; ocamlc.opt -version > 3.07 > :; ocamlopt.opt -version > 3.07 > Thanks John... your message prompted me to try another version. I couldn't find a plain 3.07 (as it's been replaced by 3.07+2 on the website), but I downloaded and installed 3.06. My demo program compiled with 3.06 this also displays the correct output. (Correct as in the bug doesn't happen.) So it seems that 3.06 and 3.07 work correctly, but 3.07+2 doesn't, for me at least. Perhaps someone on the list with 3.07+2 installed can compile my demo program and let me know what happens. This will tell me if this is a bug introduced in 3.07+2 (or 3.07+1) or if it's a bug that just affects me. (Maybe I broke my O'Caml install somehow, although I don't really see how.) Regards, Nick ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners