From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F67BC69 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:13:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l41HCKH8011142 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:13:41 +0200 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so2441050nzf for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:13:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BrJnxRQ14ntRvvIyuXJWlM/hLLlKtrufgqJ6TihT/R6+a5/UvTOUPjHtozwaLDJfFbjpUJ3jvReF10dm7CDdKYedaK5G80F5+LFlR1vpnd7hxGqeuAKLXmnPRu8AEIAn6Awc327ZC60eB3If2HqKFR9F8ZPDtLwYXGAV1Vt/OVs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FdFjHAi3G6+YRAT6o/+EpKyCCPd0Ifha/2UuDRtak8uZ0g5Tq381IkXHFumOgz6IaL2AMTlpcnpaApBQ7dgXyj049mXEE3LRUaerHMZATY1VvCgux5Oxw59mdQErbk4Smfwp1ppFwss56Tw2c2/r7UhKgCnJEY5WWzwArbC5CZY= Received: by 10.115.108.1 with SMTP id k1mr2456859wam.1178039619923; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.183.15 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2007 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:13:39 +0200 From: "Nicolas Pouillard" To: "Joel Reymont" Subject: Re: Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10 Cc: "Caml List" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <220DCCF0-FD2D-4116-8E30-992C1AD3FE95@gmail.com> <08610813-0F6F-4BC4-BB22-42FB0CF5EC84@gmail.com> <1779983C-70FC-4FD4-918D-2403B1D9885E@gmail.com> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 463774F4.000 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 463774F4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 variants:01 ctyp:01 variants:01 notations:01 ctyp:01 2007,:98 polymorphic:01 polymorphic:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 poly:02 poly:02 match:02 match:02 On 5/1/07, Joel Reymont wrote: > > On May 1, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > > No, no, no there is still a difference between poly variants and > > classic ones. > > > > When I wrote `id it's for polymorphic ones. > > Then I would use <:ctyp< $id$ >> to match variants and `id to match > poly variants, right? To be consistent on notations <:ctyp< $id$ >> to match variants <:ctyp< `$id$ >> to match polymorphic variants -- Nicolas Pouillard