From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jake.donham@gmail.com>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4279ABBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:00:27 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoUCAGJiW0vRVd7Limdsb2JhbACUD4dJPwEBAQoJDAcRBatGhC+IIgEBAwWENgSLWA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,333,1262559600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="54579444"
Received: from mail-pz0-f203.google.com ([209.85.222.203])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2010 06:00:26 +0100
Received: by pzk41 with SMTP id 41so541203pzk.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:00:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc
         :content-type;
        bh=5mNX0cfcHy7Hvs3kyfqeKTVoyYyzxbf2M8pw+JWJFT0=;
        b=HXAseglDtuZySuQqp1T09vRJ0nWV/3QW4Fx3NRB/3W8GayYVTsu1sgdYiYQW0439ur
         PSSt7gcFtyaDSY3V3TlDCzXyV5uiUX71hxVDpLaTxZ6t+eQ51H9gPdLW/lBedSg85qJ7
         CiOnwSkkMbn0oGBHABvuT6KJxBjRz3TI/TE8E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        b=IlYEb928qLJAll9IVMQq/gS7O9FIhaMN0GxJXFh4qdwPuW79VFd3JsxqRATdhSkNxi
         9hrMAjZWI9e33/IdGKppd7r9wG5MzFiSBsWwaz2wwXZp1usjA2xeoq+VyEBqE1Z0Eqym
         FYEKCdri1vtitLD1vQkLjooc9zBtMBV5Y6+ck=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jake.donham@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.59.9 with SMTP id h9mr1799684wfa.91.1264309224045; Sat, 23 
	Jan 2010 21:00:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B5B31E3.5060605@citycable.ch>
References: <4B3A7C34.3060606@yziquel.homelinux.org> <4B4F3402.4010307@citycable.ch> 
	<c55009e71001160745y5b9a03b9r326a98d1e42f1cd5@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4B5B2F9F.3050302@citycable.ch> <4B5B31E3.5060605@citycable.ch>
From: Jake Donham <jake@donham.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:00:04 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 931f4625ae23a8fd
Message-ID: <c7e4e9f1001232100o53a507d4g51b65fe82e9a554c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Toplevel debugging.
To: guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam: no; 0.00; toplevel:01 guillaume:01 guillaume:01 debugger:01 toplevel:01 usr:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 ocaml:01 backtrace:01 23,:98 blog:98 wrote:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Guillaume Yziquel
<guillaume.yziquel@citycable.ch> wrote:
> I am wondering how to use a debugger with libraries in the toplevel. As
> /usr/bin/ocaml is bytecode and that the exception is raised from OCaml and
> not from C code, I do not have a backtrace:

You may find this patch helpful; it adds backtraces to the toplevel:

  http://skydeck.com/blog/programming/more-stack-traces-in-ocaml

I have been meaning to update it for 3.11.x, but you might get some
insight into your problem by running on 3.10.2.