From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jake.donham@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA8BC58
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:18:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au0BAO+ukkrRVd6/kGdsb2JhbACaST8BAQEBCQkMBxMDrFmOeQEDAgSEFgWIYw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,267,1249250400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="31592857"
Received: from mail-pz0-f191.google.com ([209.85.222.191])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2009 00:18:54 +0200
Received: by pzk29 with SMTP id 29so1167767pzk.1
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=MTgHEVCe883IJ8PIg4vRD4isTN7OaJCelz+5AShyXzc=;
        b=DxQDL466gXas1LLKEYfN6s6kBY++Vnoc3YO3FmMgkjZgYhBSLBXRQDU7BD+5QoshE+
         OubDzahWFonWG7eaTZFJmTK81BinTI9bAIm0qHm4e61exXXbkSa/qgtubS5xIaYNT59A
         DZ5ulKaR6n+teO5WBamm7QlOZxmxmx3qdLVX0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=rlgXCL1ifF0/K3+q6pjBRPhVo/34c4YQjC+k6sNtsL60/DyQQstcwglPCm1P3CP7JY
         +Lj0qjN3yMpF11nZnqxy+3T2pOKdXg9C4SesGruKzRaXhBv54rGVDw8XyALJI1TH7E+D
         9f1urRrsgQ+d63CSVa7SNg1gZUyHM/GvxDGkU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jake.donham@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.249.7 with SMTP id w7mr520445wfh.317.1251152333118; Mon, 
	24 Aug 2009 15:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F950E129-5A1A-46A1-A85C-90A8CCAE03A5@gmail.com>
References: <94AD5806-B6F6-44F7-AA3C-1E63B6C1A722@metaweb.com> 
	<c7e4e9f0908241504m51d796b2wa49f0b0df84f603d@mail.gmail.com> 
	<F950E129-5A1A-46A1-A85C-90A8CCAE03A5@gmail.com>
From: Jake Donham <jake@donham.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:18:33 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c2acdf214ff7b21c
Message-ID: <c7e4e9f0908241518r71f2d27bv53ec64a2156fe61a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] lazy vs fun
To: Warren Harris <warrensomebody@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; memoize:01 2009:98 warren:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 lazy:02 lazy:02 guess:04 manual:06 cells:08 overlooked:08 fun:08 aug:10 defer:15 thanks:17 

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Warren Harris<warrensomebody@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Lazy cells don't just defer, they also memoize the returned value once
>> the cell is forced.
>
> Thanks Jake - I guess I overlooked that in the manual.

Hope you're doing well. Best of luck on the CUFP talk.

Jake