From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95816BB81 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:35:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jB7LZt9U005419 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:35:56 +0100 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so484190wra for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:35:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CgnIbuLDzH7GGjRyhHUFPwb2S4kKzQTeuvBAYsYQyaKtHraWV2/kXAY8zrrFb/ClCLCeUshLsGfa5MFv4c3YldBdeVuAZqywXqsjhi3FvtBIVrdhprIB9Jk5zBitFg7xzRliiLB1gTf+wddoSLDBMjWeJEnCi81u6LJxQCDnvdo= Received: by 10.65.181.10 with SMTP id i10mr2245807qbp; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.192.4 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:35:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:35:51 -0500 From: "Michael D. Adams" To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: Impact of French DADVSI law on Free Software and OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Slashdot) In-Reply-To: <200512071520.jB7FKNPo080592@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3d13dcfc0512070655i2545dc1dp@mail.gmail.com> <200512071520.jB7FKNPo080592@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 439755BB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 burned:98 softwares:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 imho:01 types:02 sell:96 extension:05 mean:07 michael:08 michael:08 silly:08 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On 12/7/05, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > This is the same issue. If I give a burned CDROM with OCaml on it (or > more realistically my own Free Software made with OCaml), should I > register it? > > =3D> the law applies when you give it to a public so IMHO it applies > if you sell it, even for free, or distribute it in a conference, etc, > but not when you give it to your friends. > As I've said it is an extension to the 500 year old law for books > to softwares on physical medium. Does the law for books mean that pamphlets that just contain the agenda for a conference must be registered? I leave it as an exercise to the reader to imagine other types of documents that are provided to the public but for which it would be silly to register (e.g. bus schedules, newsletters, take-home restaurant menus, etc.). I would hope that there must be some lower bound beyond which books don't need to be registered. Michael D. Adams mdmkolbe@gmail.com