From: Chris Campbell <cyberdanx@gmail.com>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Feeding the OCaml GUI troll
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:43:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c22844d10509010743431117d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125580528.7192.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 01/09/05, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:49 -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
>
> > I'm not sold on the idea of a "simple" GUI front end.
>
> I am. My idea is this: GET RID OF CALLBACKS.
> The idea is to use (user space) threads instead.
>
> The big problem with GUI's is that they're passive.
> You write 'event handlers' and have to store the current
> state manually. By control inverting the code, you can
> just use a thread for each widget.
Joe Armstrong did something like this with Erlang and X called Ex11.
Can't remember how it works exactly, but it seems each widget is a
thread and can process events independantly of the others.
http://www.erlang.se/workshop/2004/ex11.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-02 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-28 15:38 Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
[not found] ` <aefe758210f7fa0b9846b0ea4278cf3a@rouaix.org>
2005-08-28 23:21 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-29 22:33 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 4:39 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 11:39 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-30 11:48 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 12:22 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:45 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 15:47 ` David MENTRE
2005-08-30 16:08 ` Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:25 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:20 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 11:26 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 14:09 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 16:21 ` Bardur Arantsson
2005-08-30 17:47 ` [Caml-list] " David Thomas
2005-08-30 18:06 ` Tyler Eaves
2005-08-30 19:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:55 ` Chris Campbell
[not found] ` <c22844d10508301553b54841b@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-30 22:56 ` Fwd: " Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 23:04 ` Doug Kirk
2005-08-31 0:08 ` Fwd: " Jon Harrop
2005-08-31 0:31 ` Olivier Andrieu
2005-08-31 8:48 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-31 9:06 ` Proposal a GUI from Ocamlsdl Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-31 14:39 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 19:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2005-08-31 14:27 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Jon Harrop
2005-09-01 4:49 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:15 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-09-01 13:28 ` David MENTRE
2005-09-01 13:50 ` skaller
2005-09-01 14:43 ` Chris Campbell [this message]
2005-09-02 7:40 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-09-02 12:39 ` skaller
2005-09-03 10:34 ` Damien Bobillot
2005-09-03 12:30 ` skaller
2005-09-04 14:08 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-03 11:10 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-03 11:30 ` Jonathan Roewen
2005-09-03 17:23 ` Doug Kirk
2005-09-04 14:01 ` Richard Jones
2005-09-01 19:23 ` Feeding the OCaml GUI troll (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Nathaniel Gray
2005-09-01 4:31 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 4:17 ` Matt Gushee
2005-09-01 13:25 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 7:16 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) David MENTRE
2005-08-30 9:53 ` GUI for OCaml Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-30 10:28 ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2005-08-30 13:04 ` Bünzli Daniel
2005-08-30 17:13 ` David Thomas
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Mark Shinwell
2005-08-30 14:22 ` Jacques Carette
2005-08-30 23:12 ` Pietro Abate
2005-08-30 14:14 ` GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) Richard Jones
2005-08-30 15:33 ` mmzeeman
2005-08-30 15:44 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 22:34 ` yoann padioleau
2005-09-01 4:58 ` Matt Gushee
2005-08-30 16:01 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-30 16:25 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:49 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 16:03 ` Chris Campbell
2005-08-30 22:31 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-31 8:19 ` About Lablgtk2 (was: e: GUI for OCaml) David MENTRE
2005-09-03 11:41 ` yoann padioleau
2005-08-30 17:35 ` [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? Olivier Andrieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c22844d10509010743431117d6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=cyberdanx@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mgushee@havenrock.com \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox