From: Chris Campbell <cyberdanx@gmail.com>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:05:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c22844d10508081605b81d77f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508081935.01424.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On 08/08/05, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 18:58, skaller wrote:
> > > Rather than writing a whole report (seeing as there's no interest in it),
> >
> > That is a silly conclusion IMHO. Did you really expect existing
> > Ocaml experts to buy a report on use of Ocaml in industry targetted
> > at MANAGERS??
>
> My theory was that programmers who appreciate better languages might want some
> evidence that they can present to their managers in order to help justify the
> use of non-mainstream languages. I was curious to see if anyone here was in
> such a position.
No one is going to pay £800 to buy a report containing evidence Ocaml
works in industry. You may make a damn good case, but it ain't gonna
happen.
If you don't have a few million to spend on advertising, some free
t-shirts and big signs with words like "disruptive", "lower tco", and
all that jazz you're coming through the back door with word of mouth.
That means you write applications in it, applications which are used!
This is one thing people fail to understand. Ordinary users won't
care if your software is written in OCaml, Brainf**k or Java. The
application is primary to them. Developers otoh will care about the
underlying language. To get their attention though you need to do
more than write some code. You need to write code that gets used.
That's the hard bit though. What will people use?
> I get the impression that most people here (like me) write OCaml code without
> benefit of a manager. ;-)
Yep. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-08 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-01 17:26 Jon Harrop
2005-08-08 17:14 ` [Caml-list] " Nicolas Cannasse
2005-08-08 17:20 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-08 17:58 ` skaller
2005-08-08 18:35 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-08 23:05 ` Chris Campbell [this message]
2005-08-08 23:32 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-08-09 1:49 ` skaller
2005-08-09 3:18 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2005-08-09 4:17 ` skaller
2005-08-09 5:39 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2005-08-08 20:30 ` Yaron Minsky
2005-08-08 21:10 ` Jeremy O'Donoghue
2005-08-09 15:34 ` Eric Stokes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c22844d10508081605b81d77f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=cyberdanx@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox