Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom <tom.primozic@gmail.com>
To: "Caml-list List" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: More registers in modern day CPUs
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:20:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1490a380709052320l792fae9ew2013618cd5917cc0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 622 bytes --]

(This question may not be OCaml specific, but I guess it is not specific at
all, and there are quite some people here that have implemented compilers,
so I post it here...)

I was thinking about compiler implementation recently, and figured that it
is difficult to design the compiler for a variable number of hardware
registers - compared for designing a compiler witha fixed number of
registers.

However, would it be possible to "emulate" cpu registers using software? By
keeping registers in the main memory, but accessing them often enough to
keep them in primary cache? That would be quite fast I believe...

 - Tom

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 662 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2007-09-06  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-06  6:20 Tom [this message]
2007-09-06  7:17 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2007-09-06  9:07 ` Richard Jones
2007-09-06 14:55 ` Chris King
2007-09-06 15:17   ` Brian Hurt
2007-09-06 15:54     ` Harrison, John R
2007-09-06 17:10       ` David MENTRE
2007-09-06 18:27         ` Harrison, John R
2007-09-06 18:28         ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-09-06 18:48           ` Brian Hurt
2007-09-06 18:48           ` Pal-Kristian Engstad
2007-11-20 15:32             ` [Caml-list] OCalm on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) Mike Hogan
2007-11-21 17:20               ` Richard Jones
2007-11-21 19:05                 ` [Caml-list] OCaml " Mike Hogan
2007-11-23  6:44                 ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-02 10:14               ` [Caml-list] OCalm " Xavier Leroy
2007-12-02 16:22                 ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-02 22:19                   ` Konrad Meyer
2007-12-03  0:09                     ` [Caml-list] OCaml " Mike Hogan
2007-12-03 20:16                       ` minithread (was OCaml on Sony PS3) Christophe Raffalli
2007-12-04 14:25                         ` [Caml-list] " David MENTRE
2007-12-04 14:37                         ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2007-12-04 16:25                           ` Mattias Engdegård
2007-12-04 17:33                         ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-12-04 18:00                         ` Mike Hogan
2007-12-04  2:29                 ` [Caml-list] OCalm on Sony PS3 (was Re: More registers in modern day CPUs) Gordon Henriksen
2007-09-06 20:48   ` [Caml-list] More registers in modern day CPUs Richard Jones
     [not found]   ` <20070906204524.GB10798@furbychan.cocan.org>
2007-09-06 20:59     ` Chris King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1490a380709052320l792fae9ew2013618cd5917cc0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tom.primozic@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox