> And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an
> authoritative source to support your claims ?
>
> Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is
> worth not using it.

Yeah, terminology sucks.  Let's abandon all terminology.

Why so? Why not rather define it, so that it is definite and absolute once and for all. Then we become that authoritative source... :P

- Tom