From: Tom <tom.primozic@gmail.com>
To: "Chad Perrin" <perrin@apotheon.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:50:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1490a380612231350j5cfaebd6hcfcceffe53ed4a9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061223160612.GA8851@apotheon.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
>
>
> > And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an
> > authoritative source to support your claims ?
> >
> > Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is
> > worth not using it.
>
> Yeah, terminology sucks. Let's abandon all terminology.
Why so? Why not rather define it, so that it is definite and absolute once
and for all. Then we become that authoritative source... :P
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 652 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-23 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-21 3:41 Scripting in ocaml Denis Bueno
2006-12-21 4:34 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2006-12-21 7:22 ` skaller
2006-12-21 9:12 ` Till Varoquaux
2006-12-21 9:18 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 10:29 ` skaller
2006-12-21 20:21 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 13:30 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 13:52 ` skaller
2006-12-21 14:59 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 20:25 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 20:41 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-21 22:16 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:21 ` strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml) Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 16:51 ` Tom
2006-12-22 17:34 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 18:16 ` skaller
2006-12-22 18:47 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 19:42 ` skaller
2006-12-22 20:03 ` David Brown
2006-12-22 20:17 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 3:48 ` skaller
2006-12-23 4:11 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:19 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 12:58 ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-23 16:06 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 21:50 ` Tom [this message]
2006-12-26 6:10 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:14 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 21:11 ` [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 21:27 ` Philippe Wang
2006-12-21 22:06 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-22 12:35 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-21 22:19 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:37 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 18:52 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 2:51 ` skaller
2006-12-22 15:20 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 11:32 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-23 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-24 0:15 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-24 3:30 ` skaller
2006-12-21 14:59 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-21 20:27 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 23:35 ` Martin Jambon
2006-12-26 17:14 ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-26 23:36 ` Ian Zimmerman
2006-12-27 18:25 ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-27 18:39 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-27 19:20 ` Aleksey Nogin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1490a380612231350j5cfaebd6hcfcceffe53ed4a9c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tom.primozic@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=perrin@apotheon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox