Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom <tom.primozic@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch>
Cc: "Chad Perrin" <perrin@apotheon.com>,
	"Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>,
	caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:51:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1490a380612220851h1e9fe047q3978b70c3a9b01bd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EC73FC3-41A6-4FB1-9549-29286A6568CC@epfl.ch>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 817 bytes --]

>
>
> Later he gives the following chart
>
>         |Statically checked       | Dynamically checked
> -------------------------------------------------
> safe   | ML, Haskell, Java, etc. | Lisp, Scheme, Perl, Postscript, etc
> unsafe | C, C++, etc.            |
>
>
But this chart is not expressive enough... I believe that the properties
implied by "weak/strong" refer to the ability (or the disability) of the
compiler/runtime (or rather semantics of the language) to change types at
will (actually, whenever this seems useful, in cases such as "string" + 7 or
"9" - "3").

This category would include C and C++ (implicit conversions of numbers) and
certainly dynamically checked languages such as php, javascript, (probably
also) Ruby, Python, ...

I believe that these languages need to be distinguished.

- Tom

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1188 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-22 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-21  3:41 Scripting in ocaml Denis Bueno
2006-12-21  4:34 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2006-12-21  7:22   ` skaller
2006-12-21  9:12     ` Till Varoquaux
2006-12-21  9:18     ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 10:29       ` skaller
2006-12-21 20:21         ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 13:30     ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 13:52       ` skaller
2006-12-21 14:59         ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 20:25           ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 20:41             ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-21 22:16               ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:21                 ` strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml) Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 16:51                   ` Tom [this message]
2006-12-22 17:34                     ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 18:16                     ` skaller
2006-12-22 18:47                       ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-22 19:42                         ` skaller
2006-12-22 20:03                           ` David Brown
2006-12-22 20:17                             ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23  3:48                               ` skaller
2006-12-23  4:11                                 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:19                           ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 12:58                           ` Daniel Bünzli
2006-12-23 16:06                             ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-23 21:50                               ` Tom
2006-12-26  6:10                                 ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 20:14                   ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 21:11             ` [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-21 21:27               ` Philippe Wang
2006-12-21 22:06                 ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-22 12:35                 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-21 22:19               ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22 12:37                 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 18:52                   ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-22  2:51               ` skaller
2006-12-22 15:20                 ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-22 11:32               ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-23 18:50           ` Jon Harrop
2006-12-24  0:15             ` Serge Aleynikov
2006-12-24  3:30             ` skaller
2006-12-21 14:59 ` Richard Jones
2006-12-21 20:27   ` Chad Perrin
2006-12-21 23:35   ` Martin Jambon
2006-12-26 17:14 ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-26 23:36   ` Ian Zimmerman
2006-12-27 18:25     ` Aleksey Nogin
2006-12-27 18:39       ` Richard Jones
2006-12-27 19:20         ` Aleksey Nogin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1490a380612220851h1e9fe047q3978b70c3a9b01bd@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tom.primozic@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=daniel.buenzli@epfl.ch \
    --cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=perrin@apotheon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox