Re: [Caml-list] looping recursion

["Corey O'Connor" <coreyoconnor@gmail.com>]

Is the connection due to persistance? 
So given a data structure is persistant across operations, let's say a
stack. Suppose if two threads are working with the same instance of a
data structure. One thread pushes a value onto the stack, the other
does not. Due to persistance the other thread's instance of the stack
is unaffected?

-Corey

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:42:27 +0200, Alex Baretta <alex@baretta.com> wrote:
> 
> I didn't understand the connection between multithreading and
> persistence, but it's probably too late and I've been working far too
> much to follow you entirely. Let me just give you a couple eurocents of
> industrial experience: side-effects are utterly bad. My Xcaml
> application server was designed two years ago with one major flaw: one
> global state variable. I'm still fighting with the execution engine to
> take it away, but that won't happen before a major rewrite. I won't by
> imperative programming for anything at all. And, yes, in my company the
> mandated standard for deques is batched queues à la Okasaki.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> 


-- 
-Corey O'Connor

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners