From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149ADBC6C for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:23:58 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAALSEoUdIDtydk2dsb2JhbACCPDSNMgEBAQEHBAQLCBaXZ4Fv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,285,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22024299" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2008 17:23:57 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so927875fgb.43 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:23:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=yb6HW5DkENbx2QN/RguC3FhxFfCvL+c5x5g77IKNe/8=; b=pI6cD6CFtCLEeKvNT3xdfmPl3JFcyCciq7E8GKC2hi2TLJq9HZR3b7hbQVTUF7Mz1IzqIxCn/Uzsu6zjtb5fNQjxnc13u9r9LdLcRhGUmqXCcdDo+4g8RnYYl/KVS6WWkgQTQDNK297sS5/DbKcnjqjk7AOZnDWrAETQpGuZoR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fs0CKLf4AfOVoMC7WCU7VUByiHCg59r4ICSgDzcIHBNEmQP9vUWiNdU8nlx7vsXT7d0w1B97oBCHvvmEgV/NXA855fnoqTTywNAUQDDqUUFNG5QSR700QRgraeXceEDPznV/WlWHQucLhnY6NT+OWQ5/FMgkbYrnpNoVJdGZiy4= Received: by 10.86.50.8 with SMTP id x8mr2040874fgx.61.1201796636285; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.52.20 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:23:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:23:56 -0500 From: "Jonathan Bryant" To: "Romain Beauxis" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Caml Community Code Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200801311708.06613.toots@rastageeks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3384_1886363.1201796636268" References: <200801311708.06613.toots@rastageeks.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; sylvan:98 sylvan:98 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 seems:03 seems:03 thu:05 thu:05 i'd:06 i'd:06 ecrit:06 ------=_Part_3384_1886363.1201796636268 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le Thursday 31 January 2008 16:57:24 Jonathan Bryant, vous avez =E9crit : [...] > > It's a good idea, but it seems a duplicate of the ocamlcore.org on-going > server announced by Sylvain.. > > So rather than creating another instance, it should be better to join > efforts > together, don't you think ? > I did not see that message in the midst of that thread. On the one hand, I don't want to duplicate efforts. On the other, SourceForge has a host of development resources available, plus builtin user management, etc. It would be nice to have our own site, but there doesn't seem to be much at al= l up yet. I'd be in favor of having something that's working _now_ as oppose= d to something that's going the be amazing ... in a few months ... whenever w= e get it up ... Sylvan, what are your thoughts? The last thing I want is two "competing" sites... --Jonathan ------=_Part_3384_1886363.1201796636268 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Romain= Beauxis <toot= s@rastageeks.org> wrote:
Le Thursday 31 January 2008 16:57:24 Jonathan Bryant, vous avez =E9crit&nbs= p;:

[...]
 

It's a good idea, but it seems a duplicate of the ocamlcore.org on-going
server announced by Sylvain.. 


So rather than creating another instance, it should be better to join effor= ts
together, don't you think ?

I did not see that message in the midst of that threa= d.  On the one hand, I don't want to duplicate efforts.  On t= he other, SourceForge has a host of development resources available, plus b= uiltin user management, etc.  It would be nice to have our own site, b= ut there doesn't seem to be much at all up yet.  I'd be in fav= or of having something that's working _now_ as opposed to something th= at's going the be amazing ... in a few months ... whenever we get it up= ...

Sylvan, what are your thoughts?  The last thing I want is two &quo= t;competing" sites...
 
--Jonathan

------=_Part_3384_1886363.1201796636268--