From: Francois Pottier <francois.pottier@inria.fr>
To: Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] automatically resolving open?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:32:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1043d81-1eb2-4175-aa64-308f51e7814c@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAj03hsKG9C9rdb-@pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp>
Hello,
Le 23/04/2025 à 16:10, Kenichi Asai a écrit :
> Would it be possible to transform an OCaml file to the one that does
> not use open?
I don't know whether it is possible/easy to do this today,
but it would certainly interesting and useful to have such
a tool.
I note that the output that you expect cannot always be
produced, due to name shadowing issues. For example if
the program is
open List
module List = struct end
let test = map (fun x -> x + 1) [1; 2; 3]
then the best output that one can expect is
let map = List.map
module List = struct end
let test = map (fun x -> x + 1) [1; 2; 3]
That said (contradicting myself), one can actually obtain
better output if one is careful to always use absolute paths.
In this example one could write:
module List = struct end
let test = Stdlib.List.map (fun x -> x + 1) [1; 2; 3]
which relies on the fact that the name "Stdlib" is not shadowed.
As far as I know there is currently no syntax for absolute
paths in OCaml (every path is relative, and every name can
be shadowed). Maybe we should consider adding such a syntax?
--
François Pottier
francois.pottier@inria.fr
https://cambium.inria.fr/~fpottier/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 14:10 Kenichi Asai
2025-04-23 14:32 ` Francois Pottier [this message]
2025-04-23 14:38 ` BOBOT François
2025-04-23 14:45 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2025-04-23 15:33 ` Jeremy Yallop
2025-04-24 4:33 ` Oleg
2025-04-24 6:39 ` Virgile Prevosto
2025-04-24 9:16 ` Ulysse Gérard
2025-04-24 13:06 ` Kenichi Asai
2025-04-24 13:44 ` Ulysse Gérard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1043d81-1eb2-4175-aa64-308f51e7814c@inria.fr \
--to=francois.pottier@inria.fr \
--cc=asai@is.ocha.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox