From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07638018B for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:25:50 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,379,1493676000"; d="scan'208";a="229426615" Received: from va-138-210-10-97.dhcp.embarqhsd.net (HELO hadrien.local) ([138.210.10.97]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2017 19:25:49 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:25:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: SP cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <88108a18-8044-bc46-bed3-aef241b4ff48@linux-france.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Caml-list] segmentation fault On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, SP wrote: > You can use `tailcall` attribute to verify if it is tail-call optimised. > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/extn.html#sec246 Thanks. For the moment, though, I have no idea what function call is causing the problem. julia > > -- > SP > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >