From: "Nathaniel Gray" <n8gray@gmail.com>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Jacques Garrigue" <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>,
caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Select on channels (again)
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:19:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aee06c9e0608251519i1c5722eaxf0c9e4ea6495f7b6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1156470934.20759.166.camel@rosella.wigram>
On 8/24/06, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> The thing is, you can already do this, guaranteed!
> It is rather heavy though: you make two pthreads
> and read one fd in each, then send the
> results down a single Event channel: the user code
> can then read the parsed objects in sequence,
> blocking until the first is available, then blocking
> until the second is available.
>
> The point is that although this is heavy, it is guaranteed
> to work, so using Event module with pthreads is actually
> easier to reason about.
I understand this perfectly, but I don't think it obviates the need
for select on channels. The programmer should be free to choose the
approach that suits him best, not have it forced upon him by
limitations in the standard library.
> If you would like to do this without the cost of spawning
> pthreads .. then you need to use Felix, not Ocaml :)
Unfortunately that's not an option for me, but maybe in the future...
Cheers,
-n8
--
>>>-- Nathaniel Gray -- Caltech Computer Science ------>
>>>-- Mojave Project -- http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu -->
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-25 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-15 0:46 Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-21 22:47 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-22 0:42 ` [Caml-list] " Jonathan Roewen
2006-08-22 6:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-22 6:41 ` Jonathan Roewen
2006-08-22 8:15 ` skaller
2006-08-22 21:15 ` Mike Lin
2006-08-23 5:12 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-22 8:10 ` Olivier Andrieu
2006-08-23 5:27 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-22 8:21 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-08-23 5:16 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-23 6:35 ` skaller
2006-08-23 19:31 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-24 5:37 ` skaller
2006-08-24 19:06 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-08-25 1:55 ` skaller
2006-08-25 22:19 ` Nathaniel Gray [this message]
2006-08-23 8:29 Christoph Bauer
2006-08-23 17:35 ` Robert Roessler
2006-08-24 8:18 ` Robert Roessler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aee06c9e0608251519i1c5722eaxf0c9e4ea6495f7b6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=n8gray@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox