From: Leo P White <lpw25@cam.ac.uk>
To: Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr>
Cc: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>, caml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] ocamlopen 1.0.2
Date: 12 Apr 2012 21:31:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.4.1204122131440.27529@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F870F05.5010903@frisch.fr>
On Apr 12 2012, Alain Frisch wrote:
>Do we really need a new special tag? Why not use Object_tag and
>represent slots as blocks of size 2 (constructor name + unique integer
>as the second field)? This would have the following consequences (which
>are the expected ones):
>
I hadn't really considered that option, but it seems like that would
probably work. It would mean a slightly slower structural comparison, but
on the other hand it would produce better hashes and might allow slightly
quicker pattern matching in some specific cases.
Regards,
Leo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 21:13 Leo P White
2012-04-12 12:56 ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-04-12 14:03 ` Alain Frisch
2012-04-12 14:16 ` Philippe Veber
2012-04-12 14:29 ` Alain Frisch
2012-04-17 10:02 ` Philippe Veber
2012-04-12 17:07 ` Leo P White
2012-04-12 17:21 ` Alain Frisch
2012-04-12 20:31 ` Leo P White [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Prayer.1.3.4.1204122131440.27529@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk \
--to=lpw25@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=alain@frisch.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox