From: Martin Jambon <martin_jambon@emailuser.net>
To: Eric Cooper <ecc@cmu.edu>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:03:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602231101510.26379@munge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060223183306.GA17390@localhost>
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Eric Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:28:48PM +0100, Frdric Gava wrote:
>> is anybody can semantically explain why this 2 types are differents ?
>>
>> # type t=A of int*int and t'= B of (int*int);;
>> type t = A of int * int
>> and t' = B of (int * int)
>> [...]
>> I understand that it'is force you to have a pair for A and not just a value
>> of type pair but why this restriction ? It is not easy to explain why
>> int*int <> (int*int).
>
> See section 18.3.4 of the manual -- the distinction allows the runtime
> representation of t to avoid a level of indirection. And since the
> runtime representations are different, the types have to be different.
See also how this issue is handled by the revised syntax:
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-camlp4/manual007.html#toc24
Martin
--
Martin Jambon, PhD
http://martin.jambon.free.fr
Visit http://wikiomics.org, the Bioinformatics Howto Wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 17:28 Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 18:33 ` [Caml-list] " Eric Cooper
2006-02-23 19:03 ` Martin Jambon [this message]
2006-02-23 19:07 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 20:15 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 21:30 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 21:57 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 22:30 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 22:50 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-23 23:07 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 8:38 ` Alessandro Baretta
2006-02-24 12:59 ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-23 18:33 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-02-23 18:56 ` David Brown
2006-02-23 19:24 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 19:37 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-23 19:45 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 0:01 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-02-24 0:18 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2006-02-24 2:17 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-02-24 13:07 ` Alain Frisch
2006-02-25 17:42 ` Vincent Balat
2006-02-25 18:30 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-25 19:09 ` Richard Jones
2006-03-01 12:48 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-25 23:17 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2006-03-01 13:01 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2006-02-27 11:14 ` camlp4 renovation [was: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?] Hendrik Tews
2006-02-24 13:39 ` [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ? Nicolas Cannasse
2006-02-24 14:49 ` Frédéric Gava
2006-02-24 8:27 ` also for tagged records? [Was: Re: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?] Sebastian Egner
2006-02-24 14:01 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-02-23 20:58 ` [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ? Jon Harrop
2006-02-23 21:36 ` Frédéric Gava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0602231101510.26379@munge \
--to=martin_jambon@emailuser.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=ecc@cmu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox