From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DAFBCAE for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:27:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from salt.cs.brown.edu (salt.cs.brown.edu [128.148.32.122]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j6IDRLSp021939 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:27:21 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by salt.cs.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7754F15B5BC; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from salt.cs.brown.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (salt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24166-09; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from null.cs.brown.edu (null.cs.brown.edu [128.148.38.190]) by salt.cs.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B9415B59C; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from point.cs.brown.edu (point [128.148.33.31]) by null.cs.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01E2148005; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by point.cs.brown.edu (Postfix, from userid 30102) id D1D2B7CD4; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by point.cs.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67194530D; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nathaniel J. Gaylinn" X-X-Sender: ngaylinn@point To: Hendrik Tews Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamldebug breakpoint issues (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at cs.brown.edu X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 42DBAE39.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamldebug:01 breakpoints:01 stepping:01 breakpoints:01 more-or-less:01 stepping:01 bug:01 btw:02 whatnot:04 problem:05 problem:05 quite:06 break:07 break:07 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: > Then I started trying to set breakpoints at each event one after the > other. That's when I began to see odd behavior. > > BTW, why don't you use the single stepping feature, if you want > to break at every event? Because I wanted to test the breakpoint feature and see if it would break at any event I asked for :) That's the frustrating thing to me about this breakpoints problem, it's a serious thing that should be dealt with, but there are several other ways of more-or-less doign the same thing with stepping/goto and whatnot. Somehow that sort of belittles the problem where I feel it should be handled directly and taken quite seriously. Oh well, I'll submit a bug report. Thanks for giving me some sort of validation ;) -- Nate