From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: Christian Lindig <lindig@cs.uni-sb.de>, Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] EQ hash tables?
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:11:12 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510121304510.13519@eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <434CC328.7060803@inria.fr>
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> Easily definable using the functorial interface to hash tables:
>
> module MyEqHashTable =
> Hashtbl.Make(struct
> type t = my_type_for_keys
> let equal = (==)
> let hash = Hashtbl.hash
> end)
>
> > Of course, "EQ hash tables" have to be treated in a slightly special way
> > when talking about stop© GCing.
>
> No, not "of course". You're thinking of using the address of a memory
> block as its hash value. This indeed requires GC support. But you
> can get the semantics you want (keys compared by reference) while
> still computing the hash code structurally. This is what the code
> snippet above does.
Hm, okay. I agree that this does give me the same semantics.
But doesn't this degrade expected lookup performance to an O(n) list
lookup if I put a lot of stuff into the hash which is (=) but not (==)?
--
regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_
Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\
(lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_
(if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-12 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 13:42 [Caml-list] possible to define a type where = is forbidden ? yoann padioleau
2005-10-10 15:04 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-11 14:56 ` EQ hash tables? Thomas Fischbacher
2005-10-12 7:41 ` [Caml-list] " Hendrik Tews
2005-10-12 8:02 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-10-12 11:11 ` Thomas Fischbacher [this message]
2005-10-12 15:06 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-10-12 17:53 ` Thomas Fischbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0510121304510.13519@eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--to=thomas.fischbacher@physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=lindig@cs.uni-sb.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox