From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
To: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@lri.fr>
Cc: donna+spam@cs.cmu.edu, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How useful do you find the OCaml debugger?
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:46:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402040945240.28543@seekar.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16416.43741.584621.112229@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Jean-Christophe Filliatre wrote:
> I agree: the ocaml debugger is not very useful because usually if your
> ocaml code compiles it is correct :-)
If that is true, than the problems you are tackling are too simple to
be really interesting. :->
--
regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_
Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\
(lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_
(if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 4:31 donna+spam
2004-02-04 8:18 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-02-04 8:46 ` Thomas Fischbacher [this message]
2004-02-04 9:19 ` [Caml-list] " Jan Kybic
2004-02-04 10:15 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2004-02-04 10:30 ` Pierre Boulet
2004-02-04 15:04 ` Christophe Raffalli
2004-02-04 19:26 ` Kip Macy
2004-02-04 10:36 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere
2004-02-04 15:38 ` Damien Doligez
2004-02-04 12:52 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2004-02-04 15:35 ` Damien Doligez
2004-02-04 16:45 ` Ken Rose
2004-02-04 19:12 ` Issac Trotts
2004-02-22 21:21 ` _JusSx_
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0402040945240.28543@seekar.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--to=thomas.fischbacher@physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--cc=Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@lri.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=donna+spam@cs.cmu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox