From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
To: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ?
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:00:09 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407080952090.4202-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40ED190E.3080005@ps.uni-sb.de>
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> David Brown wrote:
> >
> > In some functional languages (Scheme, specifically), tail recursion is
> > required to be implemented iteratively. It is a common enough idiom,
> > and easy enough to implement, that it is generally done in functional
> > languages. In fact, gcc does it in C, with enough optimization.
>
> The latter is, to a certain extent, a myth.
>
> First, you have to distinguish between simple tail *recursion*, and the
> much more general concept of tail *call*. I believe Scheme requires to
> fully optimize the latter, and so it is done by all decent FPL
> implementations. GCC does not do that, already falling short of mutually
> recursive functions, IIRC.
GCC has started optimizing tail calls in 3.x.
I compiled:
int fib(int a, int b, int n) {
if (n <= 1) {
return b;
} else {
return fib(b, a+b, n-1);
}
}
with gcc 3.2.2 -O2, and got:
.globl fib
.type fib,@function
fib:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
movl 12(%ebp), %ecx
pushl %ebx
movl 16(%ebp), %edx
movl 8(%ebp), %ebx
.p2align 2,,3
.L4:
cmpl $1, %edx
jle .L5
leal (%ecx,%ebx), %eax
decl %edx
movl %ecx, %ebx
movl %eax, %ecx
jmp .L4
.L5:
movl %ecx, %eax
popl %ebx
leave
ret
Notice that it's turned the tail call recursion into a loop. I don't
recall it doing this back in 2.95 or 2.96, so it's a pretty recent
improvement, but it does now exist.
What it's limits are, I haven't determined, but it does exist.
--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
- Gene Spafford
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-08 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 6:45 Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-07-07 8:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-07 9:13 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-07 12:32 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-07-07 13:00 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-07 15:09 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-07 17:06 ` David Brown
2004-07-07 17:43 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-08 3:40 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 11:06 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-07 13:06 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-07 13:22 ` David Haguenauer
2004-07-07 15:48 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-07 13:57 ` Evgeny Chukreev
2004-07-07 14:58 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-07 15:48 ` Evgeny Chukreev
2004-07-07 19:16 ` skaller
2004-07-08 3:44 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 5:50 ` skaller
2004-07-08 9:51 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-07-08 12:03 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-07-08 14:04 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 14:36 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-08 15:11 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-08 15:49 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-09 14:06 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-09 16:20 ` Markus Mottl
[not found] ` <Luc.Maranget@inria.fr>
2004-07-09 17:54 ` Norman Ramsey
2004-07-12 8:08 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-08 15:51 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-08 18:27 ` skaller
2004-07-08 21:14 ` [Caml-list] tail recursion and register poor Intel architecture Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-08 21:35 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-08 23:01 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 4:36 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-09 6:53 ` Florian Hars
2004-07-09 14:44 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 6:55 ` skaller
2004-07-09 14:45 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 16:09 ` skaller
2004-07-10 9:19 ` [Caml-list] embedded OCaml Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-11 23:11 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-12 7:39 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-12 14:04 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-12 18:48 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-12 23:22 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-13 6:39 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-13 8:47 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 8:58 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-07-13 9:47 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 9:18 ` Damien Doligez
2004-07-13 9:56 ` [Caml-list] OCaml as business model Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 9:59 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-13 10:50 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 11:20 ` Damien Doligez
2004-07-13 12:01 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-14 8:05 ` [Caml-list] embedded OCaml I R T
2004-07-12 10:25 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-07-13 7:06 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-08 17:12 ` Tail calls (Was Re: [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ?) brogoff
2004-07-08 17:23 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-12 17:07 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-12 21:13 ` skaller
2004-07-13 7:20 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-08 15:00 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2004-07-08 13:30 ` [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ? Alex Baretta
2004-07-07 21:26 ` Jon Harrop
2004-07-08 5:05 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0407080952090.4202-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox