From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
To: Martin Berger <martinb@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
Cc: skaller@tpg.com.au, The Trade <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:52:42 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401300036480.4211-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40199FE0.1070100@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Martin Berger wrote:
> > Perhaps because you're a type theorist? <g>
>
> being a type theorist has many disadvantages ...
>
> > C not only *does* have function types, it has
> > first class function values just like ML does.
>
> well, i'm not so sure about this for two reasons.
Technically, he's correct. What C doesn't have is partial function
application, which makes having functional types much less worthwhile-
it's impossible for a function type to also contain state. Which is why
when I do callbacks in C, I always include a void * context which is
passed (uninspected) to the callback routine.
I mean, writting this function in C would be interesting to say the least:
let summer ival =
let cval = ref ival in
let f x = cval := !cval + x; !cval in
f
;;
C's type syntax also discourages you from using pointers to functions.
I've been programming C way too long, I can just dash out prototypes like:
extern int (*)(int (*)(int), int) foo(int (*)(int (*)(int), int), int);
I can parse them too, although normally I *would* use typedefs. The ocaml
equivelent type:
((int -> int) -> int -> int) -> int -> ((int -> int) -> int -> int)
is easier to read and easier to type and parse.
>
> firstly, NULL-pointers (i'm assuming that in C/C++ function
> pointers can be NULL, though it's been too long for me to remember
> precisely).
They can. You can even cast integer values to be function pointers- and I
have, legitimately (hint: BIOS functions). I've also debugged bugs where
wild pointers where clobbering function pointers, and boy wasn't that fun.
I'm not sure I'd compare NULL to variant types. It's more like a
standardized abuse of C's concept of a pointer.
--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
- Gene Spafford
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-27 6:32 [Caml-list] ocaml killer Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 8:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-27 9:43 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 18:32 ` Shawn Wagner
2004-01-28 4:38 ` skaller
2004-01-28 5:30 ` james woodyatt
[not found] ` <40168498.6070708@tfb.com>
2004-01-27 19:10 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-28 13:29 ` David Fox
2004-01-28 15:12 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-27 9:41 ` Alexander Danilov
2004-01-27 9:57 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 16:43 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-27 18:19 ` David Fox
2004-01-27 18:47 ` Richard Jones
2004-01-27 19:29 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-28 13:30 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-28 23:26 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-28 23:47 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:00 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:04 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:34 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:47 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer' Matt Gushee
2004-01-29 8:52 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 16:20 ` fancy types (was Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer) William Lovas
2004-01-29 17:13 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:26 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2004-01-29 17:17 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 17:41 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 19:18 ` William Lovas
2004-01-30 10:36 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-31 3:39 ` William Lovas
2004-02-01 2:11 ` Vasile Rotaru
2004-02-02 11:08 ` Florian Hars
2004-01-29 18:33 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 17:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer skaller
2004-01-29 5:20 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-29 6:36 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-29 8:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency james woodyatt
2004-01-29 9:46 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 10:37 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 11:51 ` Michael Hicks
2004-01-29 12:20 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 12:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 15:42 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 16:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 16:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 17:19 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 17:54 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 18:08 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 0:19 ` Lauri Alanko
2004-01-29 19:37 ` skaller
2004-01-30 0:05 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 6:52 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2004-01-30 8:53 ` Issac Trotts
2004-01-30 20:45 ` skaller
2004-01-31 6:29 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 20:12 ` skaller
2004-01-29 18:35 ` skaller
2004-01-29 9:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 18:26 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0401300036480.4211-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=martinb@dcs.qmul.ac.uk \
--cc=skaller@tpg.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox