From: malc <malc@pulsesoft.com>
To: Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@tiscalinet.be>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: float boxing (was: matrix-matrix multiply)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:08:09 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231605530.824-100000@home.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021023.121626.64579491.debian00@tiscalinet.be>
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> >
> > You might try converting your references to mutable fields.
> >
> > let x = ref 1.0 in
> > let n = int_of_string Sys.argv.(1) in
> > for i = 1 to n do x := !x +. 1.0 done
> >
> > ./ref 100000000 2.51s user 0.00s system 99% cpu 2.515 total
> >
> > type t = { mutable f:float };;
> > let x = { f = 1.0 } in
> > let n = int_of_string Sys.argv.(1) in
> > for i = 1 to n do x.f <- x.f +. 1.0 done
> >
> > ./ref2 100000000 1.54s user 0.01s system 100% cpu 1.542 total
>
> A few questions in view of this. First, on my machine (AMD Athlon
> 1GHz running GNU/Linux), the timings give a preference to ref.ml
>
> time ./ref 100000000
> real 0m1.279s user 0m1.280s sys 0m0.000s
> time ./ref2 100000000
> real 0m1.411s user 0m1.380s sys 0m0.000s
>
> What could be a reason for that?
I think the reason is simple, both are more or less nop operations,
x or x.f is not used anywhere, hence no need to allocate the float.
This short example highlights the difference:
let useref n =
let x = ref 1.0 in
for i = 1 to n do x := !x +. 1.0 done;
!x
type t = { mutable f:float };;
let userec n =
let x = { f = 1.0 } in
for i = 1 to n do x.f <- x.f +. 1.0 done;
x.f
let _ =
let n = int_of_string Sys.argv.(2) in
Printf.printf "%f\n"
(if Sys.argv.(1) = "ref" then
useref n
else
userec n)
ref# time ./refrec rec 100000000
100000001.000000
real 0m2.283s
user 0m2.280s
sys 0m0.000s
ref# time ./refrec ref 100000000
100000001.000000
real 0m1.916s
user 0m1.910s
sys 0m0.010s
More or less same machine here.
--
mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 20:09 [Caml-list] matrix-matrix multiply - O'Caml is 6 times slower than C Paul Stodghill
2002-10-20 9:42 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-10-20 18:06 ` Paul Stodghill
2002-10-20 21:58 ` Issac Trotts
2002-10-23 10:16 ` [Caml-list] Re: float boxing (was: matrix-matrix multiply) Christophe TROESTLER
2002-10-23 12:08 ` malc [this message]
2002-10-24 0:00 ` malc
2002-10-21 12:53 ` [Caml-list] matrix-matrix multiply - O'Caml is 6 times slower than C Xavier Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231605530.824-100000@home.oyster.ru \
--to=malc@pulsesoft.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=debian00@tiscalinet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox