From: Brian Hurt <brian.hurt@qlogic.com>
To: <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Looking for a real array
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:40:30 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0304281123140.3160-100000@eagle.ancor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304280034.25569.exa@kablonet.com.tr>
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> I knew this all along but looks like I neglected that an array is in fact an
> array of pointers rather than an array of contiguous storage blocks in
> memory. Is there a way to get real FORTRAN/C arrays for people who might not
> want this extra level of indirection?
>
> val make : int -> 'a -> 'a array
> Array.make n x returns a fresh array of length n, initialized with x. All the
> elements of this new array are initially physically equal to x (in the sense
> of the == predicate). Consequently, if x is mutable, it is shared among all
> elements of the array, and modifying x through one of the array entries will
> modify all other entries at the same time.
If this is a problem, you might want to use Array.init instead. Instead
of doing (for instance):
let r = ref 0.0 in Array.make n r
which returns an array of float references, initially all r, so changing
one changes all of them, instead do:
Array.init n (fun _ -> ref 0.0)
which creates a new reference for every element.
Having a reference in addition to the data structure is a little bit of
overhead. But optimization is a tricky thing- often times, what you gain
in the straights you lose in the curves. For example, what happens when
some other peice of code keeps a pointer to a single element of the array,
when the pointer to the rest of the array- and all the other elements- are
gone? In ocaml, the array and all the other elements become garbage, and
the last, lone object that is not garbage stays around. Also, copying
becomes a big issue in my experience.
Personally, I find one extra level of dereferencing isn't that big of a
deal. If you're too the point where it is a big deal, you are already
talking about hand-tuned assembly language. My advice: stop worrying
about minutia. Permature optimization is the root of all evil.
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-28 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-27 21:34 Eray Ozkural
2003-04-28 16:40 ` Brian Hurt [this message]
2003-04-28 18:29 ` Eray Ozkural
2003-04-28 18:43 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-28 18:51 ` Eray Ozkural
2003-04-28 19:05 ` Brian Hurt
2003-04-28 19:05 ` Eray Ozkural
2003-04-28 19:07 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-28 19:21 ` Karl Zilles
2003-04-29 10:52 ` Markus Mottl
2003-04-29 14:10 ` Hal Daume III
2003-04-29 15:46 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0304281123140.3160-100000@eagle.ancor.com \
--to=brian.hurt@qlogic.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox