* [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently @ 2002-10-02 14:55 david.fox 2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: david.fox @ 2002-10-02 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: caml-list I just encountered a situation where the bytecode and native versions of a program behave differently. It turns out that out of bounds array accesses return a different message: Invalid_argument "Array.get" vs. Invalid_argument "out-of-bound array or string access" I was catching the former but not the latter. I don't know if I'm making a mistake by paying attention to the message or if this is a problem or issue in the standard libs, but I thought I'd point it out. Thanks, -david ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently 2002-10-02 14:55 [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently david.fox @ 2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Henri Dubois-Ferriere @ 2002-10-03 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: david.fox; +Cc: caml-list This is filed as bug 1347 in the ocaml 'bugzilla' Another similar bug is that in bytecode, a divide-by-zero is reported as "Fatal error: exception Division_by_zero", whereas in native you get "Floating point exception". Henri > I just encountered a situation where the bytecode and native versions > of a program behave differently. It turns out that out of bounds > array accesses return a different message: > > Invalid_argument "Array.get" > > vs. > > Invalid_argument "out-of-bound array or string access" > > I was catching the former but not the latter. I don't know if I'm > making a mistake by paying attention to the message or if this is a > problem or issue in the standard libs, but I thought I'd point it out. > Thanks, > > -david > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-03 8:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-10-02 14:55 [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently david.fox 2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox