* [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently
@ 2002-10-02 14:55 david.fox
2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: david.fox @ 2002-10-02 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I just encountered a situation where the bytecode and native versions
of a program behave differently. It turns out that out of bounds
array accesses return a different message:
Invalid_argument "Array.get"
vs.
Invalid_argument "out-of-bound array or string access"
I was catching the former but not the latter. I don't know if I'm
making a mistake by paying attention to the message or if this is a
problem or issue in the standard libs, but I thought I'd point it out.
Thanks,
-david
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently
2002-10-02 14:55 [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently david.fox
@ 2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Henri Dubois-Ferriere @ 2002-10-03 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david.fox; +Cc: caml-list
This is filed as bug 1347 in the ocaml 'bugzilla'
Another similar bug is that in bytecode, a divide-by-zero is reported as
"Fatal error: exception Division_by_zero", whereas in native you get
"Floating point exception".
Henri
> I just encountered a situation where the bytecode and native versions
> of a program behave differently. It turns out that out of bounds
> array accesses return a different message:
>
> Invalid_argument "Array.get"
>
> vs.
>
> Invalid_argument "out-of-bound array or string access"
>
> I was catching the former but not the latter. I don't know if I'm
> making a mistake by paying attention to the message or if this is a
> problem or issue in the standard libs, but I thought I'd point it out.
> Thanks,
>
> -david
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-03 8:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-02 14:55 [Caml-list] Ouch - when bytecode and native behave differently david.fox
2002-10-03 8:11 ` Henri Dubois-Ferriere
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox