From: James Hague <jhague@dadgum.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Numeric programming efficiency question
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:32:53 -0600 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990323132423.4176A-100000@babba.advancenet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990323181227.25036@pauillac.inria.fr>
Xavier Leroy wrote:
> So, it's not too bad, although it might not generate optimal code all
> the time due to the rather simple-minded inlining and unboxing
> algorithms used in ocamlopt.
I found the term "simple-minded" to be highly amusing, considering that
OCaml is generally considered to generate the best code of all free
implementations of functional languages using a pattern matching syntax!
James Hague
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-24 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-22 18:33 James Hague
1999-03-23 17:12 ` Xavier Leroy
1999-03-23 19:32 ` James Hague [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.96.990323132423.4176A-100000@babba.advancenet.net \
--to=jhague@dadgum.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox