From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA08093; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:21:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA08175 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:21:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from sundance.cse.ucsc.edu (sundance.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.62]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id h0O7L6r24056 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:21:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (vaibhav@localhost) by sundance.cse.ucsc.edu (8.6.10/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA17632 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:21:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: sundance.cse.ucsc.edu: vaibhav owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:21:05 -0800 (PST) From: Vaibhav Bhandari To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Function Indirection overhead? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I am not sure, if in ocaml we write let f = Hop.a; where f and Hop.a are methods, does the compiler "short-circuit" the call, or not? Does anyone know? How can we find out? A benchmark? regards, vaibhav ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners