From: David Monniaux <monniaux@clipper.ens.fr>
To: Wolfram Kahl <kahl@diogenes.informatik.unibw-muenchen.de>
Cc: Liste CAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: List.filter in Ocaml 2.02
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 03:43:26 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.04.9903130341520.1527-100000@brick.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990312101049.6512.qmail@diogenes.informatik.unibw-muenchen.de>
On 12 Mar 1999, Wolfram Kahl wrote:
> The fact that this is reported to work anyway, implies
> that the compiler shares these common subexpressions ``[]'',
> and this gets me asking:
If I'm not mistaken, the reason is much more trivial. [] is a 0-ary
constructor and is as such stored as an unboxed integer. Two unboxed
integers of the same value are "physically equal". :-)
Regards,
D. Monniaux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-15 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
1999-03-05 10:41 ` Objective Caml 2.02 Xavier Leroy
1999-03-05 13:34 ` Camlp4 2.02 Daniel de Rauglaudre
1999-03-05 15:11 ` Objective Caml 2.02 Pierpaolo Bernardi
1999-03-05 19:59 ` doligez
1999-03-11 3:06 ` Upgrade from OCaml 2.01 to OCaml 2.02 made things _slower_! Alexey Nogin
1999-03-11 9:44 ` Xavier Leroy
1999-03-11 23:59 ` Alexey Nogin
1999-03-13 13:40 ` Anton Moscal
1999-03-24 4:20 ` Alexey Nogin
1999-03-26 11:49 ` Anton Moscal
1999-04-06 2:06 ` Alexey Nogin
1999-04-06 7:53 ` Xavier Leroy
1999-03-11 23:42 ` List.filter in Ocaml 2.02 Alexey Nogin
1999-03-12 10:10 ` Wolfram Kahl
1999-03-12 18:18 ` Alexey Nogin
1999-03-13 2:43 ` David Monniaux [this message]
1999-03-12 17:01 ` Jean-Francois Monin
1999-03-12 18:41 ` Alexey Nogin
[not found] ` <199903121011.LAA27611@lsun565.lannion.cnet.fr>
1999-03-12 18:37 ` Alexey Nogin
1999-03-15 9:06 ` Jean-Francois Monin
1999-03-06 0:27 Sort.array easily degenerates Markus Mottl
1999-03-09 10:44 ` Xavier Leroy
1999-03-09 23:03 ` doligez
1999-03-10 13:58 ` Xavier Leroy
1999-03-10 0:28 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.04.9903130341520.1527-100000@brick.ens.fr \
--to=monniaux@clipper.ens.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=kahl@diogenes.informatik.unibw-muenchen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox