From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA02876 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:42:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA19392 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:22:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from cri.ens-lyon.fr (cri.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.1.32]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA26536 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:22:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from cordeliers (cordeliers [140.77.191.103]) by cri.ens-lyon.fr (8.8.5/8.8.1) with SMTP id SAA23100 for ; Wed, 14 May 1997 18:22:38 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 18:22:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: David Monniaux X-Sender: dmonniau@cordeliers To: Caml-list Subject: ocamlyacc Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: weis I may sound stupid, but has anybody had experience of ocamlyacc parsers that would enter a neverending loop when attempting error recovery in productions near the root of the syntax tree? (I use 1.05) Thanks. -- Je vais peut-etre paraitre idiot, mais quelqu'un a-t-il l'experience de parsers ocamlyacc qui entreraient en boucle infinie en essayant de recuperer d'une erreur de syntaxe dans une production pres de la racine de l'arbre syntaxique? J'utilise 1.05. Merci. David "Why does the compiler give a type error THERE?" Computing science student at ENS, Lyon, France http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~dmonniau