Re: [Caml-list] ocaml and large development projects

[Lex Stein <stein@eecs.harvard.edu>]

Fortunately you can amortize the cost of this change to your Makefile
across all your builds. In the limit it approaches 0.

Lex

On Sun, 18 May 2003, Ed L Cashin wrote:

> Lex Stein <stein@eecs.harvard.edu> writes:
>
> > You are missing the point. It is not true that building a program
> > requires full recompilation. The point that Prof. Hickey made was
> > that a program requires full recompilation if you make a change then
> > build *native* code.
>
> I've never used ocamlc -- I have no reason to, so I tend to think of
> ocamlopt as the ocaml compiler.  Ideally, ocamlc and ocamlopt would be
> equally flexible.
>
> It never occurred to me that I'd have to create a more complex
> makefile just to get real separate compilation during development by
> using ocamlc, doing ocamlopt only at the end.
>
> --
> --Ed L Cashin     PGP public key: http://noserose.net/e/pgp/
>
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners